Adsorption process simulations

Design and optimise in minutes, entirely in the browser.

A simulator built specifically for designing cyclic pressure swing adsorption (PSA) and temperature swing adsorption (TSA). Run to cyclic steady state in minutes.

PressuriseAdsorbBlowdownPurge0246810Bed pressure (bar)

Why Skarstrom

Everything you need from a process simulator.

01

Built for cyclic adsorption, not flowsheeting

No drag-and-drop canvas to wire up. Define a PSA, VSA, or TSA cycle by specifying its boundary conditions directly — and be running in minutes.

02

Multi-objective optimisation

Purity, recovery, productivity, and specific energy are computed automatically at cyclic steady state. Optimise the trade-offs and read off the Pareto front.

03

Fit model parameters to experimental data

Parameterise models against experimental data and compare simulation to measurement right in the GUI without exporting results to Excel.

04

Web-native, on any device

Runs entirely in the browser. Log in from anywhere. Your licence is never locked to a single machine, and you are always on the latest version.

05

Complex cycles made simple

Purge streams, pressure equalisation, heavy reflux, multi-bed interconnections — design intricate cycles intuitively.

See it run in your browser.

Request access

Workspace

No install required, simulate in the browser.

Competitors like Aspen Adsorption and gPROMS require desktop applications to be installed, updated and locked to specific devices. Skarstrom is a web-native simulator, using an optimised C++ solver that can run to cyclic steady state in minutes.

Skarstrom workspace showing an interior column pressure profile after running a PSA cycle

Positioning

Where Skarstrom fits.

Adsorption modelling today mostly happens in Aspen Adsorption and gPROMS. Here is how Skarstrom compares on what teams actually feel: speed, cost, and delivery.

Aspen AdsorptiongPROMSSkarstrom
Simulation speed≈50× slower on the same cycle≈5× slower on the same cycleFastest — the baseline the others are measured against
Cost per licenceTens of thousands of pounds per seatTens of thousands of pounds per seatUnder £1,000 per licence
Optimisation & parameterisationRequires add-ons or external scriptingRequires add-ons or external scriptingBuilt in — Pareto optimisation and parameter sweeps out of the box
DeploymentDesktop install and configurationDesktop install and configurationRuns in the browser — nothing to install, always the current version
LicensingNode-locked to a specific machineNode-locked to a specific machineLog in from any machine — no hardware-locked licence

Validation

Benchmarked against eight published studies.

Skarstrom reproduces breakthrough experiments and full cycle results from the peer-reviewed literature. Every study below ships as an example case in the software — open it, run it, and compare against the paper yourself.

Perez, Sarka & Rajendran (2019)

CO₂/N₂ vacuum swing adsorption on zeolite 13X

Compared: CO₂ purity and recovery at cyclic steady state across six cycle configurations

DOI

Arora & Hasan (2021)

Medical O₂ concentrator on LiLSX zeolite

Compared: O₂ purity and recovery for PSA and PVSA Skarstrom cycles

DOI

Streb & Mazzotti (2021)

H₂/CO₂/CH₄ mixtures on zeolite 13X

Compared: Multicomponent breakthrough curves

DOI

Ward & Pini (2022)

Dynamic CO₂ breakthrough experiments

Compared: Outlet composition and column temperature at three flow rates

DOI

Nguyen, Shimizu & Rajendran (2023)

CO₂/N₂ separation on CALF-20

Compared: Ten VPSA experiments at cyclic steady state

DOI

Vysyaraju et al. (2024)

Helium purification from He/N₂ on zeolite 5A

Compared: PSA purification cycles

DOI

Ward & Pini (2024)

CO₂/N₂ PSA on Mg-MOF-74 and activated carbon

Compared: PSA cycle with two adsorbents

DOI

Ferré et al. (2026)

Biogas upgrading by single-bed PVSA

Compared: Co-production of high-purity CO₂ and CH₄

DOI
Simulated CO₂ breakthrough curve overlaid on experimental data from Ward & Pini (2022)Simulated column temperature overlaid on experimental data from Ward & Pini (2022)
Skarstrom output (lines) against breakthrough and temperature measurements (points) from Ward & Pini (2022).

Applications

One tool for adsorption-based gas separation.

The same column model and cycle engine covers equilibrium- and kinetics-driven separations across pressure, vacuum, and temperature swing operation.

Carbon capture

Post-combustion CO₂ capture with vacuum and temperature swing cycles on zeolites, MOFs, and amine sorbents.

Hydrogen purification

H₂ PSA from reformer off-gas and syngas — multicomponent H₂/CO₂/CH₄/N₂ mixtures on layered beds.

Air separation

O₂ production by PSA and VSA on LiLSX and 5A zeolites, from medical concentrators to on-site generators.

Direct air capture

Temperature swing regeneration and ultra-dilute CO₂ feeds, with full thermal modelling of the column and wall.

Biogas upgrading

CO₂/CH₄ separation to pipeline-quality methane, including cycles that co-produce high-purity CO₂.

Inert & specialty gases

Helium recovery, nitrogen generation, and other trace-impurity separations on carbons and zeolites.

Evaluation

We will validate it for you — free.

Send us your data — experimental or simulated — and we will build the model and compare Skarstrom against it, at no cost. You see how closely it reproduces a case you already know before you commit to anything.